I thought I would just elaborate, as I did Sunday, on what God resting on the seventh day actually means in the ancient Near Eastern world.
First,
it doesn't mean that God got tired and needed a break from all that work He did
in creation. It also doesn't mean that God stopped creating. The picture isn't
literal. It's attempting to convey something important (something connected to
the rest of the narrative and the book as a whole) with the imagery of God
ceasing to labor and resting. And that something is sovereignty. It conveys
that God is in complete and absolute control with no threat of chaos/evil to challenge
His throne. Chaos cannot overcome Him. It is not even a concern. Hence, He
rests upon His throne (i.e., within His cosmic temple).
We
see this concept in the surrounding literature as well.
After Baal defeats Yam, his temple made and purified, he finishes his conquest
and rests in his temple. This motif is common in the ancient Near East, and it
mimics the actions of a human king, who after defeating his foes, may rest in
his palace, having no more enemies to conquer.
One must remember that a temple of a god is equivalent to the palace of a king. The king rests in his palace when war is no longer a threat, when he has gained victory over destructive forces and has no more concern of them. Likewise, a god rests in a temple when he has overcome chaos, and like the king, has nothing else to worry about in terms of threat of chaos.
In Enuma elish, Marduk battles Tiamat, the primordial waters (deep waters often function in ancient Near Eastern literature as a symbol of chaos--in fact, one might say it is the primary symbol of chaos in the ANE world). After he kills Tiamat and forms the cosmos with her body, he constructs his temple as the "dwelling place of his leisure" and a "stopping place" for the gods, where they declare that within this temple, "we will find rest" (6.51-52).
What the rest and ceasing from labor teaches in Genesis 2 is that God is sovereign over chaos/evil. It is not a threat to Him, nor to His purposes. He has no concern of it in terms of it "winning." The account itself does not present chaos as personified, as do the other accounts both within the poetic literature of the Bible and in many texts outside of the Bible, but it is instead a condition of the earth that threatens the existence of mankind. God creates/orders the world so that those conditions no longer exist. Mankind can thrive. There is no threat of him being diminished. As this creation account is the view from heaven, from God's perspective, it is not negated by what we know will be coming in the chapters that follow. Instead, it puts them into perspective.
Walton summarizes the idea of šābat "rest" nicely:
The verb šābat describes a transition into the
activity or inactivity of nûha. We know that when God rests (ceases, šābat)
on the seventh day in Genesis 2, he also transitions into the condition of
stability (nûha) because that is the terminology used in Exodus 20:11 . . . His
rest is also located in his “resting place” (mĕnûhâ) in
Psalm 132, which also identifies it as the temple from which he rules. After
creation, God takes up his rest and rules from his residence . . . When the
deity rests in the temple it means that he is taking command, that he is
mounting to his throne to assume his rightful place and his proper role.[1]
This same
thing is conveyed in the only text in the Gospels that tells us that
Jesus slept. And what is the context of that sleeping? The disciples are
in the middle of the sea in a storm. The picture of the chaotic waters
that threaten God's purposes is brought to life. And what happens? Jesus
is sleeping. There is no concern that the power of chaos has any real
ability to thwart God. Instead, Jesus, as God, simply gets up, commands
the waters and the storm to be silent, and it immediately is. Thus, the
Lord conveys the idea to them, and to us, that He is sovereign and
nothing is so powerful that it is any real threat either to Him or to
His work.
Hence, the
rest conveys sovereignty, which ironically is the exact opposite of
being tuckered out and weak because of labor. God is so strong that
there is nothing for Him to fret about. And Auctor wants us to know that
we are moving toward that rest, but we have not yet entered it. We
still need to fear being found outside of Him, since He is the only one
who has nothing to fear from chaos/evil/death. We have everything to
fear if we are found outside of Him. So we need to keep a sharp eye on
whether we are pursuing God through faith in Christ and the doing of
good and the refraining from evil that evidences His lordship over our
lives.
As I said
Sunday, Christ is the only One who is saved. He's the only One who has
accomplished salvation by His works. Hence, we have to take hold of His
salvation, His safety from chaos, by letting Him take hold of us as our
Lord. Whatever He owns is saved with Him, so as long as we are in Him,
we are saved too. If we are found outside of Him, there is no hope of
salvation, as only He is saved. Hence, since we are still in the
wilderness (neither bound to the slavery of Egypt nor free from the
chaos of temptation and unbelief in the promised land), we have only to
concern ourselves ("fear" as Auctor puts it) with whether we have fallen
short of having a genuine loving and submissive relationship with
Christ. He has entered that rest. He has nothing to fear, but we have
not entered it yet, so we must be on guard against everything that seeks
to move us from the sphere of Christ's Lordship to the sphere of chaos,
where we can be destroyed.
Therefore, let us fear if, while a promise remains of entering His rest, any one of you may seem to have come short of it. For indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also; but the word they heard did not profit them, because it was not united by faith in those who heard. For we who have believed enter that rest, just as He has said, "As I swore in My wrath, They shall not enter My rest," although His works were finished from the foundation of the world. For He has said somewhere concerning the seventh [day]: "And God rested on the seventh day from all His works"; and again in this [passage], "They shall not enter My rest." Therefore, since it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly had good news preached to them failed to enter because of disobedience, He again fixes a certain day, "Today," saying through David after so long a time just as has been said before, "Today if you hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts." For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that. So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God. For the one who has entered His rest has himself also rested from his works, as God did from His. Therefore let us be diligent to enter that rest, so that no one will fall, through [following] the same example of disobedience. For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do. (Heb 4:1-13)
[1] Walton, The Lost
World, 73–75. See Sarna’s comments (Genesis,
15) that “God, through His creativity, has already established His sovereignty
over space; the idea here is that He is sovereign over time as well.”
Great post, Bryan. Very helpful for a subject that is so misunderstood by myself and so many. How would you connect this, then, to God's command for the Jews to observe the Sabbath? Obviously the Sabbath was instituted for man's benefit, as Jesus said, but what is that benefit exactly? Was it to be a reminder of God's Lordship and authority over chaos/evil, and therefore a "weekly sermon" to them about making sure they are found in Him? Was it a reminder that He is in control and they have no need to fear?
ReplyDeleteAlso, in your view, what is a Christians relationship to the Sabbath?
Thanks Josh.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting you bring this up, because this was what we were discussing after the sermon as well. The Sabbath was actually meant to be exactly what you said: a weekly sermon to, as well as a communicative picture conveying, the sovereignty of, and trust in, the Lord. That's why the guy who gets stoned due to picking up sticks on the Sabbath isn't just a committing a minor infraction. He's guilty of treason against God, their king, and is preaching contrary to the message of the Sabbath (i.e., that since YHWH is not really sovereign over chaos, I need to secure my livelihood rather than obey Him).
And that's where I would apply it. I think we should have a day of rest, as it's good for us, but I think I would take Matthew 6:19-34 as the Christian application of it (i.e., all things should be done for the glory and exaltation of God in trusting in Him through our obedience, rather than arguing pragmatics and saying that we cannot obey Him because of this or that situation might create a threat to our livelihood. So Sabbath, in that sense, is perpetual for us whenever something in life comes into conflict with our obedience to God and our goal of exalting Him as Lord of our lives. This could be that we don't want to take a day of rest because we're too concerned about not making enough money, or it could be that we don't obey something else He commanded of us because we're afraid of the "chaotic" circumstances it might create in our disfavor. To each his own application on that one (Rom 14:5-9), but the principle remains for all of God's people for all time. Hence, the Sabbath principle is eternal.